Note
Access to this page requires authorization. You can try signing in or changing directories.
Access to this page requires authorization. You can try changing directories.
Azure Application Gateway v2 provides native support for the WebSocket and HTTP/2 protocols. Both Application Gateway and the Kubernetes ingress don't have a user-configurable setting to selectively enable or disable WebSocket support.
The following Kubernetes deployment YAML shows the minimum configuration for deploying a WebSocket server, which is the same as deploying a regular web server:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: websocket-server
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
app: ws-app
replicas: 2
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: ws-app
spec:
containers:
- name: websocket-app
imagePullPolicy: Always
image: your-container-repo.azurecr.io/websockets-app
ports:
- containerPort: 8888
imagePullSecrets:
- name: azure-container-registry-credentials
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: websocket-app-service
spec:
selector:
app: ws-app
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 80
targetPort: 8888
---
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: websocket-repeater
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.class: azure/application-gateway
spec:
rules:
- host: ws.contoso.com
http:
paths:
- backend:
serviceName: websocket-app-service
servicePort: 80
Assuming that all the prerequisites are fulfilled, and you have an Application Gateway deployment controlled by a Kubernetes ingress in Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS), the preceding deployment would result in a WebSocket server exposed on port 80 of your Application Gateway deployment's public IP address and the ws.contoso.com
domain.
The following cURL command would test the WebSocket server deployment:
curl -i -N -H "Connection: Upgrade" \
-H "Upgrade: websocket" \
-H "Origin: http://localhost" \
-H "Host: ws.contoso.com" \
-H "Sec-Websocket-Version: 13" \
-H "Sec-WebSocket-Key: 123" \
http://1.2.3.4:80/ws
If your deployment doesn't explicitly define health probes, Application Gateway attempts an HTTP GET
operation on your WebSocket server endpoint.
Depending on the server implementation (such as this example), you might need WebSocket-specific headers (Sec-Websocket-Version
, for instance).
Because Application Gateway doesn't add WebSocket headers, the Application Gateway health probe response from your WebSocket server is most likely 400 Bad Request
. Application Gateway then marks your pods as unhealthy. This status eventually results in a 502 Bad Gateway
error for the consumers of the WebSocket server.
To avoid the 502 Bad Gateway
error, you might need to add an HTTP GET
handler for a health check to your server. For example, /health
returns 200 OK
.